SDLT Tax Adviser Registration: Should Conveyancers Outsource to External Advisors?

The Regulatory Shock

In December 2025, HMRC confirmed what many conveyancers had feared.  Any professional who submits Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) returns on behalf of clients will be legally required to register as a tax adviser from May 2026. This announcement has sent shock waves through the conveyancing sector.

This seismic shift raises a critical strategic question.  Should conveyancing firms embrace their new identity as tax advisers, or should they relinquish SDLT assessment to external specialists?

Understanding the New Registration Requirements

What the Legislation Entails

The Finance Bill 2025-26 introduces mandatory registration for all tax advisers who interact with HMRC on behalf of clients, effective from May 2026 (with a minimum three-month transition period).

Key requirements include:

• Eligibility Conditions: Tax advisers and their senior managers must have no outstanding tax returns, no amounts of tax due, and no insolvency, tax sanctions, disqualifications, or relevant convictions
• AML Supervision: Registration with an anti-money laundering supervisory authority
• Annual Assurances: Ongoing certification of compliance with HMRC's minimum standards
• Penalties: Fines of £5,000 (£10,000 for repeat offences) for non-compliance, with senior managers potentially personally liable

The Unclear Territory

Critical questions remain unanswered, as HMRC has yet to publish detailed guidance:

• Must individual conveyancers register, or just firms?
• How do consultants and self-employed conveyancers fit into the framework?
• What constitutes "exercising functions of management" for determining who qualifies as a senior manager?
• What are the specific "minimum standards" beyond basic eligibility?

HMRC has promised to issue detailed guidance this month, leaving firms with limited time to prepare for a May 2026 implementation.

The Professional Indemnity Insurance Time Bomb

Perhaps the most alarming aspect of this regulatory change is its potential impact on professional indemnity (PI) insurance premiums and coverage.

The Growing Risk Profile

Conveyancing professionals have long relied on disclaimers stating they provide no tax advice. However, as one industry commentator noted: "Courts, insurers, and regulators consistently look at what a firm actually does rather than how it labels the work.”

Once firms are registered with HMRC as tax advisers, disclaimers become significantly weaker. 

Key concerns include:

Increased Liability Exposure: SDLT errors often surface years after completion, precisely when memories have faded and staff have moved on. The more complex SDLT becomes with multiple reliefs, surcharges, and exemptions the higher the cost of mistakes.

Premium Increases: Industry voices have warned that PI insurers will view mandatory tax adviser registration as a fundamental change in risk profile, likely resulting in substantial premium increases for conveyancing firms.

Coverage Gaps: Some PI policies may exclude or limit coverage for tax advice, creating potential gaps in protection that firms may not discover until they face a claim.

The Case for Outsourcing: Strategic Considerations

Risk Transfer vs. Risk Retention

The fundamental question is whether firms want to carry the regulatory and liability burden of tax advice, or remain firmly within their core legal role.

Benefits of outsourcing:

• Complete transfer of SDLT liability to specialist providers with dedicated tax expertise
• Removal of requirement to register as tax advisers (if the external provider acts as the submitting agent)
• Protection through specialist PI insurance that covers tax advice specifically
• Clear audit trails and documentation from specialist providers

Retention risks:

• Personal liability for senior managers under eligibility requirements
• Ongoing compliance costs and administrative burden
• Potential PI premium increases
• Need to maintain current tax knowledge as SDLT rules evolve

The Quality and Indemnity Minefield

Recent industry analysis has revealed that not all SDLT services are created equal. 

Compass, a specialist SDLT provider, has published comparison documents highlighting critical distinctions:

Calculation Services vs. Full Responsibility: Some providers merely supply calculations or guidance, leaving the law firm as the submitting adviser. In these models, firms still need to register as tax advisers and defend SDLT positions they didn't originate if HMRC raises questions.

True Indemnity vs. Marketing Claims: Some services market "indemnified" outputs while their contractual terms exclude liability for calculation errors. Firms must scrutinise what is truly covered and who stands behind the SDLT position.

Key Questions to Ask External Providers:

1. Who submits the SDLT return to HMRC? If it's your firm, you have not transferred the risk
2. What exactly does the indemnity cover? Does it include the calculation itself or just the process?
3. Who responds to HMRC enquiries? Will the provider defend the position if challenged?
4. What are the provider's PI insurance limits? Are they adequate for your exposure?
5. How are complex cases escalated? Is there access to qualified tax specialists?
6. What audit trail is provided? Can you demonstrate proper due diligence if a claim arises?

The Complexity Factor

SDLT has evolved from a straightforward purchase tax into a labyrinthine system with numerous reliefs, surcharges, and special cases:

• Multiple dwellings relief
• Mixed-use property classifications
• First-time buyer relief
• Higher rates for additional properties
• Non-resident surcharges
• Separated spouse exemptions
• Uninhabitable property considerations

As one conveyancer commented: "SDLT is such a minefield that many accountants won't even provide advice on it.”

The question becomes, do conveyancing firms want to invest in the specialised knowledge, systems, and training required to handle these complexities confidently, or should they recognise SDLT assessment as outside their core competency?

Practical Recommendations for Conveyancing Firms

Immediate Actions (Before May 2026)

Conduct a Strategic Review

Hold partner/senior management meetings to decide whether to:

• Continue handling SDLT in-house and register as tax advisers
• Outsource SDLT assessment and submission to external specialists
• Adopt a hybrid model (routine cases in-house, complex cases outsourced)

Assess Your Current Risk Exposure

• Review your SDLT work over the past 5 years
• Identify how many complex cases you've handled
• Calculate potential liability if errors are discovered
• Consider whether current PI coverage adequately addresses tax advice claims

Evaluate Your PI Insurance

• Contact your PI insurer immediately to discuss the implications of tax adviser registration
• Request written confirmation of coverage for tax advice activities
• Obtain quotes for increased premiums if registering as tax advisers
• Compare against the cost of outsourcing to specialists

If Choosing to Outsource: Vet Providers Rigorously

Use this checklist when evaluating SDLT service providers:

• [ ] Provider acts as the submitting tax adviser (not just calculation support)
• [ ] Explicit indemnity that covers the SDLT calculation and position taken
• [ ] PI insurance with adequate limits (minimum £250,000 per claim, ideally higher)
• [ ] Provider responds to all HMRC enquiries and defends the position
• [ ] Clear escalation process for complex matters to qualified tax specialists
• [ ] Comprehensive audit trail and documentation provided
• [ ] Service level agreements for response times
• [ ] Track record and client references available

Contractual Protections:

• [ ] Written confirmation that the provider is the tax adviser for SDLT purposes
• [ ] Clear scope of indemnity in the contract (not excluded in fine print)
• [ ] Notification procedures if provider's registration is suspended
• [ ] Termination rights if service standards decline
• [ ] Data protection and confidentiality provisions

If Retaining SDLT Work In-House: Prepare for Registration

Compliance Preparation:

• Ensure all partners/senior managers personal tax affairs are up to date
• Verify current AML supervision status
• Identify who qualifies as "senior managers" under the legislation
• Prepare systems to provide annual assurances of compliance
• Budget for registration costs and ongoing compliance burden

Knowledge and Systems:

• Invest in specialised SDLT training for fee earners
• Implement robust SDLT calculation systems with regular updates
• Create comprehensive precedent files for complex cases
• Establish procedures for seeking specialist advice on edge cases
• Strengthen file documentation to demonstrate due diligence

Insurance Review:

• Obtain written confirmation from PI insurer about tax advice coverage
• Consider increased PI limits to account for SDLT liability exposure
• Budget for likely premium increases
• Review policy exclusions carefully

Client Communication Strategy

Regardless of your approach, prepare client communications:

If Outsourcing:

• Explain that specialist tax advisers will handle SDLT for accuracy and compliance
• Clarify that this may result in separate fees for SDLT services
• Emphasise the benefits - specialist expertise and enhanced protection

If Retaining:

• Inform clients of your registration as tax advisers
• Explain the enhanced regulatory framework
• Consider whether terms of engagement need updating to reflect tax advice capacity

The Hybrid Model: A Pragmatic Middle Ground

Many firms may benefit from a hybrid approach:

In-House Handling:

• Straightforward residential purchases with standard rates
• Cases clearly within existing reliefs (e.g., standard first-time buyer)
• Transactions below complexity thresholds

External Specialist Referral:

• Mixed-use classifications
• Multiple dwellings relief claims
• Separated spouse situations
• Non-resident purchasers
• Uninhabitable properties
• High-value transactions
• Cases with unusual fact patterns
• Any situation where there's uncertainty about the correct treatment

This approach allows firms to maintain control over routine work while managing risk on complex cases. However, it still requires registration as tax advisers for the cases handled in-house.

The Broader Industry Implications

What This Means for the Conveyancing Profession

The mandatory registration requirement represents a fundamental shift in how conveyancing is practiced. Several industry-wide trends are likely:

Consolidation of SDLT Expertise: Smaller firms may find the compliance burden and liability exposure unsustainable, leading to greater reliance on specialist providers or consolidation within larger firms that can support dedicated tax teams.

Fee Restructuring: Clients accustomed to SDLT being included in conveyancing fees will need to adapt to separate tax adviser fees, whether internal or external.

Service Differentiation: Firms that invest in genuine tax expertise may differentiate themselves in the market, while others may compete on efficiency by outsourcing to specialists.

New Market Entrants: Expect a proliferation of SDLT service providers offering varying levels of service and indemnity. Caveat emptor will be critical.

Talent Migration: Some conveyancers may leave the profession rather than take on tax adviser responsibilities, exacerbating existing recruitment challenges.

The Government's Perspective

The £36 million investment in the registration system aims to generate £40 million in additional annual revenue by 2027/28 by reducing tax gap through improved compliance. However, critics question whether the investment is justified given that HMRC explicitly states it "will not review the quality of the advice agents provide, qualifications, or professional conduct.”

Professional bodies including the Law Society, CIOT, and ICAEW have raised concerns that the legislation is overly broad, potentially capturing professionals who don't genuinely provide tax advice, while failing to address genuine rogues who operate outside official processes.

Making Your Decision: A Framework

Use this decision framework to determine your firm's approach:

Choose to Outsource SDLT If:

• You want to avoid registration as tax advisers entirely
• Your firm handles fewer than 100 property transactions annually
• You have limited appetite for increased regulatory burden
• SDLT represents a small portion of your revenue
• Your PI insurer indicates substantial premium increases for tax advice
• You lack partners/senior managers with tax expertise or interest
• Any of your senior managers have complex tax affairs that might affect eligibility
• You prefer to focus resources on core conveyancing competencies

Consider Retaining SDLT In-House If:

• You have (or can develop) genuine tax expertise within the firm
• You handle high volumes where economies of scale justify investment
• SDLT represents a significant competitive differentiator for your firm
• You can absorb potential PI premium increases
• All senior managers can comfortably meet eligibility requirements
• You have robust systems and processes for tax compliance
• You're prepared to invest in ongoing CPD and knowledge management
• Your firm has a track record of error-free SDLT submissions

Adopt a Hybrid Model If:

• You want to maintain control over straightforward cases
• You handle sufficient volume to justify some internal capability
• You recognise the need for specialist support on complex matters
• You want flexibility to shift the balance over time
• You can clearly define complexity thresholds and triage criteria

The Cost of Inaction

The May 2026 deadline approaches rapidly, and detailed HMRC guidance will not be available late January.. This leaves conveyancing firms with a narrow window to make strategic decisions about their future relationship with SDLT work.

Doing nothing is the riskiest option. Firms that drift into May 2026 without a clear strategy risk:

• Regulatory Non-Compliance: Inability to submit SDLT returns without registration
• Insurance Coverage Gaps: Unintended exposure due to changed risk profile
• Client Service Disruption: Inability to complete transactions on time
• Competitive Disadvantage: Loss of market position to better-prepared competitors

The evidence suggests that for most small to medium-sized conveyancing firms, outsourcing SDLT assessment and submission to specialist providers with robust indemnities offers the cleanest risk profile. It allows firms to focus on their core legal competencies while transferring complex tax liability to those best equipped to handle it.

However, larger firms with substantial transaction volumes and the resources to invest in genuine tax expertise may find a compelling case for building internal capabilities, particularly if they can leverage this as a competitive advantage.

Whatever path you choose, three principles should guide your decision:

Be Honest About Your Capabilities: Can you truly deliver tax advice to the standard clients deserve and regulators expect?

Understand the True Cost: Include not just outsourcing fees, but PI premiums, compliance burden, training costs, and potential liability exposure

Prioritise Client Protection: Choose the approach that best serves your clients' interests, not just your firm's convenience

The mandatory tax adviser registration regime may be regulatory overreach, as many commentators argue. However, it's now the reality conveyancers must navigate. The firms that will thrive are those who make informed, strategic decisions based on clear-eyed assessment of their capabilities, resources, and risk appetite.

The conveyancing landscape is changing. How will your firm adapt?

Resources and Next Steps

Stay Informed:

• Monitor HMRC guidance publications (expected January 2026)
• Engage with your professional body (Law Society, CLC, etc.)
• Attend industry webinars and conferences on the new requirements

Professional Advice:

• Consult with your PI insurance broker immediately
• Seek specialist tax law advice if considering in-house retention
• Engage with potential SDLT service providers for competitive quotes

Further Reading:

• Finance Bill 2025-26 clauses 220-246 and Schedules 19-20
• Law Society response to HMRC technical consultation
• CIOT and ICAEW representations on mandatory registration
• Today's Conveyancer ongoing coverage of developments

The time for conveyancers to act is now. May 2026 will arrive faster than you think.

Disclaimer

The information provided on this blog is for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, financial, or professional advice.

While we aim to keep the content accurate and up to date, laws and guidance can change and the information may not apply to your specific circumstances. You should not rely on this content as a substitute for taking professional advice tailored to your situation.

We accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the information contained on this blog.

If you require advice, please contact a suitably qualified professional.